Proofs
November 2025
Why do we exist, just to suffer?
Propositions
A proposition is a statement that is either true or false, ie:
6 < 10(true)4 - 1 = 7(false)
This translates to: “for all $n$ in $\mathbb{N}$, $n^2 + n + 41$ is a prime number”
This translates to: “in $mathbb{N}$, there exists a number $n$ such that $n^2 + n + 41$ is a prime number”
"this statement is false", is NOT a propositionSimilarly, the following are not propositions:
- $n^2 + n + 41$ is a prime number
- $n^3 + 2n + 17$ is an even number
- $p$ is a prime number
These are predicates - statements whose truth depends on variables
Proposition logic
NOT
| A | $\overline{A}$ |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 |
AND
| A | B | $A \wedge B$ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
OR
| A | B | $A \vee B$ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
Implies
| A | B | $A \Rightarrow B$ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
Equivalence
| A | B | $A \Leftrightarrow B$ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
Axioms
Axioms are propositions that are assumed to be true
When something is being proven, a set of axioms used are declared.
Examples of axioms:
- Axioms of Euclidian geometry
- Peano axioms
- Axiomatic definition of real numbers
- Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (with axiom of choice).
Ideally, axioms should be consistent (we cannot prove that false is true) and complete (every true proposition can be proved).
By Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, we cannot have both
Logical Deductions
If statements $P$ and $P \textrm{ implies } Q$ are true, then we can conclude that $Q$ is true
If statement $P \textrm{ implies } Q$ is true and $Q$ is false, we can conclude that $P$ is false
Direct Proof
Most theorems can be viewed as a form of $P \rightarrow Q$ (P implies Q)
In a direct proof, you start with the statement Assume $P$ is true
Then you produce a series of steps to reach $Q$
Example
Let $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}$
If $a | b$ and $b | c$ then $a | c$ (that is to say, if $a$ divides $b$ and $b$ divides $c$ then $a$ divides $c$) (divides relation on natural numbers is transitive)
- Suppose that $a | b$ and $b | c$
- Hence there are $q, r \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $aq = b$ and $br = c$
- Define $k = qr$, observe that $k \in \mathbb{N}$
- Then $ak = a(qr) = (aq)r = br = c$
- Since $ak = c$ we know $a | c$
Example
Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$ then $n | 0$
- Observe $n \cdot 0 = 0$
- Hence $n | 0$
Example
Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$, if $n$ is odd, then $n^2$ is odd
- Then $n = 2k + 1$ for some $k \in \mathbb{N}$
- So, $n^2 = (2k + 1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1$
- So, $n^2 = 2q + 1$ where $1 = 2k^2 + 2k$
- Since $k \in \mathbb{N}$, then $q = 2k^2 + 2k$ is a natural number
- $n^2$ is odd
Proof by Contrapositive
When proving $P \rightarrow Q$, we observe that it is the same as $\overline{Q} \rightarrow \overline{P}$ (if $Q$ is false, then $P$ has to be false)"We prove the contrapositive [insert contrapositive here]"
We then give a direct proof for the contrapositive
Example
Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$ if $n^2$ is even, then $n$ is even.
We prove the contrapositive $n \in \mathbb{N}$ is $n^2$ is not even, then $n$ is not even
- Assume $n$ is not even
- $n = 2k + 1$ for some $k \in \mathbb{N}$
- $n^2 = (2k + 1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1$
- $n^2 = 2q + 1$ where $q = 2k^2 + 2k$
- We showed that if $n$ is odd, $n^2$ is odd
- Therefore, if $n^2$ is even, so is $n$
Proof by Contradiction
When proving $P \rightarrow Q$, we assume it is false
That is, we assume $P$ is true and $Q$ is false.
We derive a clearly false statement (often in the form of $R \wedge \overline{R}$)
We conclude our assumption was wrong and $P \rightarrow Q$ is true
Example
Prove that the number $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational
- Assume that $\sqrt{2}$ is rational
- $\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b}$ where $a$ and $b$ do not have common divisors
- $2 = \frac{a^2}{b^2}$
- $a^2 = 2b^2$, and $a = 2k$ is even
- This means $2k^2 = b^2$, and $b = 2l$ is even
- This contradicts with $a$ and $b$ not having common divisors
Example
Let $A$, $B$ be finite sets and $f: A \rightarrow B$ a function.
If $|A| > |B|$, then $f$ is not injective
- Assume for contradiction, that $f$ is injective and $|A| > |B|$
- Then $|f(A)| = |{f(a) | a \in A }| = |A|$, therefore $|f(A)| > |B|$
- But $f(A) \subseteq B$, so $|f(A)| \leq |B|$
- So, $|f(A)| \leq |B| \lt |f(A)|$, which is a contradiction
Proof by Cases
When $P \rightarrow Q$ is more complex
- $P = A \vee B$
- We have a universal $\forall x…$ statement, without single argument for all $x$
- We split proof into separate cases
- For example, to proov $(A \vee B) \rightarrow Q$ we prove $A \rightarrow Q$ and $B \rightarrow Q$
Example
Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be sets. If $x \in A \cup (B \cup C)$ then $x \in (A \cup B) \cup C$
- Case 1 - $x \in A$
- Since $x \in A$, $x \in A \cup B$, by definition of $\cup$
- Since $x \in A \cup B$, $x \in (A \cup B) \cup C$ by definition of $\cup$
- Case 2 - $x \in B \cup C$
- Case 2a - $x \in B$
- $x \in B \Rightarrow x \in A \cup B \Rightarrow x \in (A \cup B) \cup C$
- Case 2b - $x \in C$
- $x \in C \Rightarrow x \in (A \cup B) \cup C$
- Case 2a - $x \in B$
Example 2
“Every collection of 6 people incudes 3 people that all know each other or a group of 3 strangers”
- Let $x$ be one of “people”
- Case 1 - $x$ knows set $X$ of at least $3$ of remaining $5$
- Case 1a - $y, z \in X$ know each other
- So $x, y, z$ all know each other
- Case 1b - $X$ is a group of strangers
- Case 1a - $y, z \in X$ know each other
- Case 2 - $x$ does not know set $X$ of at least $3$ of remaining $5$
- Case 2a - $y, z \in X$ do not know each other.
- So, $x, y, z$ is a group of strangers
- Case 2.2 - People in $X$ all know each other
- Case 2a - $y, z \in X$ do not know each other.
Proof by example
Proof by example can only be used for statements of type $\exists x. P(x)$
This is because we only need to present one value of $x$ that satisfies $P(x)$
This can also be used to disprove propositions, however…
Example
“Show that the following statement is false: For all $n \in \mathbb{N}$”, the number $n^2 - n + 41$ is a prime
- Let $n = 41$
- $n^2 - n + 41 = 41^2$, which is not prime
Example
Show that the following statement is false:
For all sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, $(A \cap B) \cup C = A \cap (B \cup C)$
- Let $A = \emptyset, B = C = \mathbb{N}$
- Then $(A \cap B) \cup C = \mathbb{N}$ and $A \cap (B \cup C) = \emptyset$
Proofs of Universal Statements
- These are statements of type $\forall x P(x)$
- We choose an arbritrary $x$
Counter example
Prove that the relation $R = {(x, 2^x) | x \in \mathbb{N}}$ is a function $f : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$
- Let $x \in \mathbb{N}$
- $(x, 2^x) \in R$ and if $y \neq x$, then $(x, y) \notin R$
- $2^x \in \mathbb{N}$
- Hence, for every $a \in \mathbb{N}$, there exists exactly one $b \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $(a, b) \in R$ and $R$ is a function